For convenience, filament headers are clickable and will auto-scroll when links are copy-pasted. Clicking on the main header will fix that.
Synopsis
Listing of all the known filament brands that have been tried and how they handle. Bear in mind this is a generalized "per brand" list, it is not indicative of everyone's experiences, and does not mean a brand will always be bad (or good!). But, as of January 2019, this list has been gathered from sources including print farms, businesses who use 3D printing as a tool of the trade, other hobbyists, and even my own personal experience.
For PETG, a failure of the car test puts it in the "Bad" or "UGLY" category by default. If it deforms when sitting in a car on a blistering hot summer day for extended periods of time, I cannot in good faith put it any higher. Failures are noted where known.
Subject to change without notice, date / reasons given, etc. honestly I just do this myself when I get new data and also when I remember. I can't be bothered.
Just because a brand isn't on here does NOT mean it is good filament. Or that it's bad either. Just that I literally have no data on it. Hit me up on Discord (bottom of page) — or wherever you got this link honestly — and let me know what should be added! This list is largely community run by vetted sources. But if we haven't heard of you, and you're not on here, see this note for solicitors:
Best Overall
Out of all the brands tested here, only two have had a high percentage of those talking about the brands swear by them, and had exactly zero people I've come across with anything bad to say about them: Atomic and Prusament. Prusament is still largely new, and feedback from people who have put a lot of filament brands through the ringer has been lacking. This, combined with the brand loyalty inherent to Prusa, makes me hesitant to believe its quality without the benefit of longevity in these opinions. While people daily drive other filament brands and swear by them too — for example Hatchbox — they all come with a higher amount of people that are unenthusiastic about the brand they're using, or in some cases have minor issues with the filament (I calipered in the ballpark of 0.6mm off 1.75mm both thicker and thinner on Hatchbox PETG for example).
Often these issues are one-offs, but it's been truly remarkable to me to see Atomic — a filament brand I've never used keep in mind — have a damn-near cultlike following. As soon as you bring Atomic up, someone's got something good to say about it. And although Prusament is still very new, it is still a Prusa product, a brand which too has a damn-near cultlike following. It's easy to look at Prusament as an extension to the Prusa ecosystem, but Atomic's reputation can truthfully only be explained by being genuine, honest feedback. After all, to the best of my knowledge, they sponsor nobody. The fact that their customers happily sponsor them in exchange for nothing at all in return is a testament to their consistency in quality.
Atomic is hands-down, without a doubt, my #1 recommended filament. Not because I've ever used it, but because it's been a fan favorite for over half a decade. In lieu of them however, I still have quite a hefty list!
SOLICITORS:
I do allow solicitors to add updates to the list via PM's on Discord. One or more of the following conditions MUST be met however:
1 - I know you well and can vouch for you
2 - Someone I know well has tried the filament with similar results (their experience will ALWAYS overrule a solicitor)
3 - A time-lapse video that shows your filament in action on a printer, with it normal-speed at the end, as you remove it from the bed, while you take pics in a way where it is demonstrated on camera. No funny business. Full-length video is fine too. I am extremely pedantic on this given how sketchy a solicitor is by default.
All independently-unverified additions will be marked as such in a very clear manner! I think this is more than fair. My list my overly strict rules (make your own if you don't like it).
Without further ado, here's the list:
UGLY Brands
Unfortunately, some brands are just awful for one reason or another. Sometimes their quality is just reliably abysmal. Other times they seem to take the money and run. Other times they deliver incomplete orders and claim it was 100% fulfilled. And rare, just rarely, there is a hint of fraud. OK so honestly this mostly applies to 3D printers moreso than filament (Peachy Printer anyone?) but filament brands are not immune to this. Not by a long shot. Here's a list of brands that just downright suck to deal with, and exactly why they should be in the "ALWAYS AVOID" column in this entire page.
- N/A
PLA
Good
- 3DFilies PLA+
- 3D Solutech
- 3DXTech ESD-Safe PLA
- Amolen
- Atomic
- Aurarum
- eSun PLA, PLA+
- Fiberlogy Easy PLA
- Filamentech (all types)
- Hatchbox
- KVP
- MatterHackers standard line is sufficient, Pro doesn't offer much benefit
- Polymaker Their natural PLA isn't quite as yellow as the old RepRap stuff, but still prints amazingly well. The resealable bag is a nice touch too
- Prusament
- Zyltech
Meh
- AmazonBasics Supplier changes make this a moving target
- Geeetech Gets brittle fast -- needs preheating to avoid issues
- Generic Amazon stuff Very hit-and-miss from experience
- Inland (MicroCenter) Supplier changes make this a moving target. Color inconsistency found also
- [DISCONTINUED] M3D Occasional spools will have knots. Filament is good quality otherwise
- [DISCONTINUED] PrintINZ (both PLA and PLA/PHA) My personal fave for blue tape beds, but refuses to adhere to any other surface
- RepRap.Me 3DE Very hit-and-miss
- ThriftyMake Bed adhesion issues on anything other than blue tape
Bad
N/A
UGLY
N/A
Unknown
- dasfilament Simply untested
- Filafill Simply untested
- HobbyKing Simply untested
- Prima Simply untested
- Tianese Simply untested
PETG
Good
- 3DFilies
- 3D Solutech
- Atomic
- Aurarum
- Colorfabb XT
- eSun
- Extrudr
- Fiberlogy
- Filamentech (all types)
- Filamentium CPE100
- Hatchbox
- HobbyKing
- MatterHackers Pro PETG
- Polymaker
- Prusament
- Zyltech
Meh
- 3DX MAX-G PETG "Weird texture, had a few warps with it but overall it is very good" - respected print farm
- AmazonBasics Supplier changes make this a moving target
- Inland (MicroCenter) Supplier changes make this a moving target. Color inconsistency found also
- [DISCONTINUED] M3D ABS-R Occasional spools will have knots. Filament is good quality otherwise
Bad
- Innofil There was a story here, long since forgotten. Might have failed the "car test"
- KVP Fails the "car test". These guys cannot blame it on not getting the right kind of weather in their area — I used to work a few minutes away and had the issue in my own car in the parking lot
- RepRap.Me 3DE Very hit-and-miss
UGLY
- Essentium PCTG Layer adhesion is garbage on brand new filament spools at proper temps (temp tower used for calibration), becomes VERY brittle rather quickly. For a material branded as "Higher impact strength than PETG", it has a FAR worse tolerance for bumps and bends than Inland PETG for example. I cannot thus in good faith put this anywhere else on this list -- it is absolutely advertised VERY falsely and needs to be recognized as such
Unknown
- dasfilament Simply untested
- Filafill Simply untested
- SunLu Simply untested
ABS
Good
- eSun ABS+
- Hatchbox Datasheet claims zero fumes, some report not requiring an enclosure, unknown if it responds to vapor smoothing and how it avoids fumes while being pure ABS if true
- Zyltech
Meh
N/A
Bad
N/A
UGLY
N/A
Unknown
- Aurarum Simply untested
- Filafill Simply untested
- HobbyKing Simply untested
ASA
Good
- 3DX MAX ASA
- 3DX MAX PC/ASA
- Polymaker
Meh
N/A
Bad
N/A
UGLY
N/A
Unknown
- [DISCONTINUED] M3D Simply untested -- occasional tangling noted however
- Prusament Simply untested
Nylon
Good
- 3D Solutech
- 3DXTech
- Polymaker
Meh
- Breathe 3D Extended drying times often required
Bad
N/A
UGLY
N/A
Unknown
N/A
Carbon
Good
- 3D Solutech Carbon Nylon
- 3DXTech CarbonX
- FilamenTech Carbon PLA
Meh
Meh
- Breathe 3D Extended drying times often required
Bad
N/A
UGLY
N/A
Unknown
- [DISCONTINUED] M3D Carbon PLASimply untested -- occasional tangling noted however
- [DISCONTINUED] M3D Carbon PETGSimply untested -- occasional tangling noted however
Wood
Good
- colorFabb corkFill, woodFill, bambooFill corkFill and bambooFill untested for staining capabilities
- FilamenTech Wood PLA
- Tianese Wood PLA0.5mm nozzle and 0.25 layer height minimum recommended by manufacturer
Meh
N/A
Bad
N/A
UGLY
N/A
Unknown
N/A
Flexibles
Good
- 3DP Phoenix Nylon
- eSun TPU (95 Shore)
- Filamentech PLA Flex
- Ninjatek
- Polymaker Polyflex
Meh
- [DISCONTINUED] M3D Tough Occasional spools will have knots. Filament is good quality otherwise
Bad
N/A
UGLY
N/A
Unknown
- Aurarum TPU Simply untested
- dasfilament TPU Simply untested
- NinjaFlex Simply untested
- SemiFlex Simply untested
- Taulmann This guy is insane and his filament is hard as hell to handle. So usability is obviously difficult to judge if it's difficult to print too
Misc, Exotics
Good
- 3DE PBT+
- colorFabb copperFill Sanding or tumbler with brass might be required to restore luster
- Filamentech PLA - Marble, PLASteel
- Overture Silk PLA
- Polymaker
- Ziro Marble PLA
Meh
- AmazonBasics Silk PLA Supplier changes make this a moving target
Bad
N/A
UGLY
N/A
Unknown
- Aurarum Simply untested
- Taulmann This guy is insane and his filament is hard as hell to handle. So usability is obviously difficult to judge if it's difficult to print too
If you know of any others, feel free to let me know on Discord @Julietta#5397 and I will make sure to add it once I can confirm authenticity!
- Julietta